What does a peer review specialist do?

What does a peer review specialist do?

What is peer review

Manuscripts should be submitted with a letter of presentation of the research work to the Editor, with the research data on a separate sheet, specifying the responsibility of the study and ethical commitment assumed with the results of the study. A requirement for acceptance is that the results of the research have not been disseminated, totally or partially, in the information of its results, in another journal or publication, keeping therefore the original, innovative and unpublished character.

The papers that comply with the requested guidelines will be included in the list for evaluation. The papers received will be evaluated and graded in the first instance by the Editorial Committee who will review compliance with the guidelines for submission of papers (editorial policies and guidelines for authors) and will verify the originality of the manuscript by means of Turnitin software.

The reviewers will have the following characteristics: knowledge of the subject, be external to the institution that manages the journal, have recognition as a researcher and academic, responsibility and discretion in the evaluation. The selected reviewers do not receive remuneration. The type of review is double-blind; that is, the reviewer remains anonymous to the author, and the names of the authors will not be revealed to the peer reviewers.

What does it mean when an article is peer-reviewed?

When research findings have been peer-reviewed and published in a scientific journal, it means that they are sufficiently valid, significant and original to merit the attention of other scientists.

What does the expression blind pairs mean in science?

Double-blind: Neither party (authors and reviewers) knows the identity of the other. Open: In this system both authors and reviewers know each other’s identities and allows authors and reviewers to dialogue in the review process.

See also  What is National Grid called now?

What is pairing?

It is a process where scientists (“peers”) evaluate the quality of the work of other scientists. In doing so, they aim to ensure that the work is rigorous, consistent, uses past research and adds to what we already know.

Blind peer review

Others defend the method, accepting its limitations. As some experts see it, these retractions are a sign that the scientific community is constantly watching the results it produces and is self-correcting. Peer review does not end when an article is published. It involves a first check on the contents, which takes place within the editorial team of a journal, and with the specific weight of two or three reviewers for each article. Naturally, it is not an error-free process. But where the system fails, it is the academic community itself that detects faults, identifies shortcomings and discovers weaknesses. On the other hand, it is not only that the eyes of academics are alert to what is published. Scientific publication is part of a complex ecosystem, in which there are more and more tools and recommended scientific practices that increase the assurance of what is published. One of them, especially relevant these days, is the linking of an article to the open data on which it is based and its compliance with the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable) principles.

How do you know if an article is a peer review?

Researchers know that peer-reviewed journal is the English term for any journal that publishes articles that have been previously evaluated by specialists in the field (author’s peers). In Medicine, peer review has been translated into Spanish as “arbitraje” or “revisión a cargo de expertos”.

What is original research?

In wikis, including Wikilanguage, original research is called that which is based on the direct study of primary sources, i.e. historical documents, maps, fieldwork…

See also  Is gambling illegal in New York?

How to evaluate the impact factor of a journal?

To measure the impact factor, articles published in the previous 2 years are considered and it is calculated by dividing the total number of citations received by these articles by the total number of articles published. It should be noted that the calculation of the impact factor considering 5 years has also been included.

Scientific arbitration

2. Journal editors.    Make comments on the importance and novelty of the study. Editors will use your comments to assess whether the manuscript has the appropriate level of impact for the journal. When selecting articles for publication, editors need the help of experts in the field of scientific endeavor to determine whether a manuscript’s research and analysis are sound, and whether it makes an important contribution to the discipline. Therefore, your comments and opinions about the article are much more important than a simple recommendation; editors need to know why you think an article should be published or rejected, as your reasoning will help support their decision.

3. Readership.    Identify areas that need clarification to ensure that other readers can easily understand the manuscript. As a reviewer you can also help avoid wasting readers’ time and frustration by helping to keep unimportant or erroneous research out of the published scientific literature.

What are academic peers?

CNA – Academic Peers. Academic peers are the fundamental support for the accreditation process. Peer means totally equal or similar. Strictly speaking, the peer is similar in that it can be recognized by the members of the community as one of their own.

How does peer review work?

Peer review is a type of test or evaluation of the articles by experts, external referees or referees outside the editorial group of the journal requesting the review, to publish the article and also propose to the author certain corrections that they “consider” that should be in the article, such as the …

See also  How much do t-mobile sales reps make?

What is a review?

“Revision” is a noun that can be translated as “the review,” and “review” is a transitive verb that can be translated as “to review.”

What is peer review

Academic peer review (also known as refereeing) is the process of submitting an author’s scholarly work, research, or ideas to the scrutiny of other experts in the same field before an article describing this work is published in a journal, conference proceedings, or as a book. Peer review helps the editor (i.e., the editor-in-chief, editorial board, or program committee) decide whether the work should be accepted, deemed acceptable with revisions, or rejected.

Peer review requires a community of experts in a given (and often narrowly defined) field who are qualified and able to conduct a reasonably unbiased review. Peer review is generally considered necessary for scholarly quality and is used in most major academic journals, but in no way prevents the publication of invalid research.[1] Weaknesses in common peer review practices have also been identified, leading critics to argue for reforms.